|
To the members of the MIT community,
Yesterday, the White House took the position that the Paris climate
agreement – a landmark effort to combat global warming by reducing
greenhouse gas emissions – was a bad deal for America. Other nations
have made clear that the deal is not open to renegotiation. And
unfortunately, there is no negotiating with the scientific facts.
I believe all of us have a responsibility to stand up for concerted global action to combat and adapt to climate change.
At
MIT, we take great care to get the science right. The scientific
consensus is overwhelming: As human activity emits more greenhouse gases
into the atmosphere, the global average surface temperature will
continue to rise, driving rising sea levels and extreme weather.
Global warming is not a distant problem – not distant in time or space.
Communities across the United States and around the world are already
experiencing the impacts. Without immediate and concerted action, the
damaging consequences will grow worse. As the Pentagon describes it,
climate change is a “threat multiplier,” because its direct effects
intensify other challenges, including mass migrations and zero-sum
conflicts over existential resources like water and food. In short,
global warming and its consequences present risks too grave to gamble
with.
A
global problem demands a global solution. With the Paris agreement, for
the first time in history, 190+ nations agreed to work together to do
something about it. In signing it, the U.S. was acting in concert with
other nations, with the U.S. setting its own level of carbon reductions.
The truth is that unless every nation joins in the solution, every
nation will join in the suffering.
To solve this global problem, we must transform the global energy status
quo. The Paris agreement is an important beginning: a mechanism that
drives progress on emissions right away and speeds up progress over
time. (Incidentally, MIT announced its own greenhouse gas reduction goal
in October 2015, a month before the Paris conference, with our Plan for Action on Climate Change,
which commits us to reducing our campus emissions at least 32% by
2030.) With this running start, humanity has time to prevent the worst
impacts of climate change. But the longer we hesitate, the lower the
odds of success; the carbon dioxide our cars and power plants emit today
will linger in the atmosphere for a thousand years.
Climate
change arguably represents the greatest threat of this generation.
Fortunately, it also represents a tremendous opportunity. Already,
hundreds of thousands of Americans work in the clean energy sector, and
growth in clean energy jobs is rising fast: In 2016 alone, solar
industry employment grew by 25 percent, while wind jobs grew 32 percent.
As a nation, if we choose to invest in the relevant research, we have
the opportunity to continue to lead, developing new energy technologies
that will generate high-value exports and high-quality American jobs –
the jobs of the future. That is in no way to minimize the disruption
that the changing energy economy will cause to some workers and regions.
But the solution to that problem is not to deny scientific facts and
give away economic opportunity. If we don’t seize this chance, other
nations certainly will. By withdrawing from the Paris accord, the US is
surrendering leadership in a priceless global market.
I am encouraged, however, to see so much leadership at the state and
city level, in industry and at universities – here in Massachusetts and
nationwide.
Time
and again, this country has risen to civilizational challenges with a
sense of optimism, creativity and drive. I hope that the people of the
United States will – as a matter of service to the nation and the world –
continue to take the lead in pursuing a carbon-free future.
In this work, the people of MIT have a special role to play. I look forward to working with you as we step up to the challenge.
Sincerely,
L. Rafael Reif
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
77 MASSACHUSETTS AVE, W98-300 | CAMBRIDGE, MA 02139
|
